
DJCO and IDT are diversifying away from legacy businesses with higher margin recurring revenue streams.
Daily Journal Corporation publishes newspapers and websites covering California, Arizona, and Utah. The company is headquartered in Los Angeles, California.
| Revenue (TTM) | $94.08M |
| Gross Profit (TTM) | $32.14M |
| EBITDA | $13.95M |
| Operating Margin | 15.90% |
| Return on Equity | 4.09% |
| Return on Assets | 1.81% |
| Revenue/Share (TTM) | $68.29 |
| Book Value | $252.97 |
| Price-to-Book | 2.31 |
| Price-to-Sales (TTM) | 8.49 |
| EV/Revenue | 3.996 |
| EV/EBITDA | 20.72 |
| Quarterly Earnings Growth (YoY) | 57.60% |
| Quarterly Revenue Growth (YoY) | 25.00% |
| Shares Outstanding | $1.38M |
| Float | $1.30M |
| % Insiders | 4.40% |
| % Institutions | 80.59% |
Volatility is currently expanding

DJCO and IDT are diversifying away from legacy businesses with higher margin recurring revenue streams.

DJCO posts a loss per share in fiscal Q2 as unrealized investment losses and higher operating costs offset revenue growth at Journal Technologies.

Second Quarter Fiscal 2026 Total Revenue of $22.7 Million, Reflecting a 25% Increase Year Over Year First Half Fiscal 2026 Total Revenue of $42.3 Million, Reflecting an 18% Increase Year Over Year LOS ANGELES, May 14, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Daily Journal Corporation (Nasdaq: DJCO), a publishing and technology company, today announced financial results for the three and six months ended March 31, 2026. Total consolidated revenue for the second quarter of fiscal 2026 was $22.7 million, representing a 25.0% increase from the $18.2 million reported in the prior-year quarter, driven primarily by strong growth at Journal Technologies, Inc. (JTI).

Daily Journal Corporation (DJCO) offers fair value, with most of its worth tied to marketable securities. DJCO's operating results are solid, driven by high-margin licensing and maintenance revenue growth in Journal Technologies. Valuation appears generous relative to peer Tyler Technologies (TYL), but apparent tax considerations, and a holding company-esque penalisation, can explain some of the gap.